What
started as a modest fire on Wednesday morning at around 5.00am quickly
developed into a blazing inferno that engulfed almost the entire arrivals
section of the Jomo Kenyatta Airport. The origins of the fire still remain
unknown. However, as I was watching NTV this morning on my way to work, I saw a
manageable problem grow into a huge economic disaster. By the time I reached my
workplace at 9.00am, it was evident that most of the arrivals section of the airport
was badly singed.
So how did something so moderate erupt into such a great catastrophe? According to the news report, the fault was with the Fire department which took a long time to respond to the alert. This is worrying for travellers and people who rely on the safety assurances of the police and fire department – in one word, everybody. Shouldn’t there have been some standby firefighters in the airport who could have made a quicker response? What justifies such a delay? Did they just believe that the fire, which was originally so small, could not become a great problem?
17 HOURS LATER
The
airport has since resumed its domestic flights. However, firefighters were still
on the scene, trying to extinguish what remained of the fire. Most of the
flights were diverted to the Mombasa, Kisumu, Tanzania and Uganda airports.
LETS COUNT THE LOSSES
There is primarily the obvious loss of millions of shillings in infrastructure. To reconstruct the area will take a substantial amount of money, and really, its anyone’s guess where that will come from considering the fact that the government is still fishing for money through bills that should increase taxes to fund various ongoing problems (I mean projects).To keep it short, other consequences include:
- Inconvenience to passangers and travelling business people
- Inconvenience to trade by flight
- Aviation stakeholders and potential stock market losses
- Estimated millions lost from businesses in the airport (and potentiall business days lost)
- Fruit and Flower farmers will probably feel the pinch a bit
- Inconvenience for students like me, hoping to fly abroad to resume studies (though probably the smallest problem of all)
- Tourism losses
SOLUTIONS? FOR ONE, CRITICAL THINKING IN DESIGN
As an aspiring architect, I had to touch on this. There was a report on Citizen TV at 9.00pm that one of the causes of the quick spread of the fire was the bitumen on the ceiling of the airport. Bitumen, also known as asphalt is used for waterproofing roofs. However, this event shows that perhaps we should be thinking of other sustainable and safe ways of designing, using non-flammable materials, which are not sourced from crude oil.Another problem – and yes, its actually a design problem – was the fact that the airport was designed to accommodate 2.5 million people, but actually hosts 6 million people a year. That’s bound to cause a safety hazard. It puts more people in danger, but at the same time has the potential of making it more difficult to deal with such problems in a hasty manner. Yet, truthfully, people probably never noticed. Aside from the occasional long queues and check in time (depending on time and flight), this has not been a significant problem worth mentioning until now. I’m just wondering why, if the number of people increased, the safety measures did not mirror that growth. Simple things like more fire extinguishers, hoses, etc, could have probably made a difference. When I saw the picture of the fire at its inception, it looked no bigger than a Honda CRV (I use that comparison because that’s the make of my mums car, and I explained it to her like so).However, the biggest blessing in all of this is that no casualties were reported. My hope is that it remains the same. There have been plans to expand the airport, but that has taken a significant amount of time, and this setback is bound to, well, set us back some more. I can only hope that we have learned from this mistake, and will take greater precautions ensuring the public’s safety.
Nevertheless,
Stay Sweet
xxx
No comments:
Post a Comment